About FridaySpins

What We Do Every Week

Every Friday morning, before the working day starts, the team runs the same five-step weekly cycle. Step one is a sweep of all ten tracked UK casinos to pick up any updated Friday offer — new spin counts, new eligible games, new opt-in deadlines. Step two is a line-by-line check of bonus terms against the previous week, because the headline numbers can stay the same while wagering, max win or payment-method exclusions quietly change underneath.

Step three is testing any new promotional codes — a code that does not redeem, or that drops fewer spins than promised, gets flagged immediately. Step four is updating the comparison tables and the live ranking so the data on the site reflects what is actually offered that Friday, not what was offered last month. Step five is a quick scan for new player complaints on independent forums and any licensing changes registered against the operator.

This weekly cycle is the reason we can confidently say the data on this site is current. Most competitor comparison sites refresh their bonus pages monthly at best, which is why their wagering numbers and spin counts so often disagree with what you actually see when you land on the operator. The cycle feeds straight into our side-by-side comparison tool and the live homepage Friday ranking.

Our Editorial Standards

Every page on FridaySpins is written by a person, not generated by templates and not filled in by AI. When you read on this site that a casino pays out in 24 hours, that claim comes from a real withdrawal we requested, timed and recorded. When we list a wagering requirement, we read the bonus T&Cs ourselves rather than copy the number from the operator's marketing page — which is how we catch the cases where a "10x" headline turns out to apply only after a separate 35x deposit playthrough.

We deliberately cite independent sources alongside our own findings. Casino Guru's safety index, AskGamblers' complaint records and the public regulator registries (UKGC, Curacao GCB, Anjouan AOFA) are all part of the workflow, and where they disagree with operator marketing copy we side with the independent record. If we cannot verify a casino's licence claim against the issuing regulator's database, we say "unverified" plainly rather than repeating the badge.

Our educational pages — including the Friday bonus pages and the deeper category breakdowns — are written by the same team that runs the weekly testing, so the explanation of how a wagering requirement works is never disconnected from the data we are reporting.

Transparency

We need to be upfront about how this site is funded. FridaySpins earns revenue through affiliate links — when you click a "Claim Bonus" button on one of our pages and go on to register and deposit at the casino, we may receive a commission from the operator. This is the standard way independent comparison sites in the UK gambling space pay for their work, and it is the reason we can keep the site free to use, ad-light, and update it every Friday.

What that commercial relationship does not do is influence the rating. Our scores are set from the testing process before any commercial relationship exists, and they are never adjusted in either direction in exchange for a higher commission rate. The casinos at the bottom of our ranking still appear with honest assessments. We list operators with unverified licence claims and we flag trust concerns openly, because withholding that information for a few extra clicks would make this site useless to the players we are trying to help. The same principle applies to player safety signals — they are surfaced prominently on every casino page even when they reduce the likelihood of a sign-up.